Friday, September 17, 2010

How different we all are...

Has society demanded, and subsequently achieved, equality for both genders to the point of losing sight and losing appreciation of their differences?

I have come into contact with many, many different kinds of people, male and female. While some basic generalities can be assumed about each gender, I have found that it is each individual that differs greatly. There are men who cringe at hearing any word referring to commitment, while there are men who are actively pursuing the goal of marriage, who have no fear of the future. There are women who would love nothing more than to be a mom and there are women who have no desire to ever come into contact with a child. More so than one gender being asked to be tougher, more independent, less sensitive, less emotional than the other, I have found that our society simply wants each individual to conform to an “American” image of strength and independence.

I think our society needs to embrace the differences in personality found in the world. Women (and men) are emotional beings. Demanding that an individual “toughen up” is belittling the power an emotional individual has in this world. Humans need both extremes. While a less sensitive, less emotional individual may be called to fill a more political role, or simply the role of a leader, a more emotional person is vital when dealing with other situations. Each individual is specially crafted to purposely affect the lives of the others around them. Placing fault on someone for being too sensitive or not sensitive enough is assuming that your way is the right way. When is comes to basic personality traits, there is no wrong or right. All that is required is that individuals take the time to understand each other and appreciate the differences.

In the past, the woman was called upon to be a mother and a wife. The woman was the softer side of the relationship, providing a warm haven for the rest of the family. While at times this view was used to suppress women and prevent them from pursuing intellectual goals, this was also a role that was vital to society. Victorian society did not simply think women were incapable of intellectual thoughts. Some individuals genuinely believed that the roles that women held during this time were vital to the balance of humankind. The man was not viewed as being able to fill this role as women were. Due to the fact that men have tended to be in positions of power or in the limelight, the roles of wife and mother have been viewed as being lower, more subservient, less important. However, this is simply untrue.

As a society, we need to encourage each individual to pursue their own goals, to try and provide the opportunities and means to achieving these goals. However, we need to be careful not to demean the roles which appear to be below others. Many of my female friends face constant ridicule for wanting to be a mother and wife. I also have male friends who think females incapable of being able to fill certain roles or jobs. They think men are simply better at doing certain things. While this may prove true for certain occupations requiring more physical strength, each individual should be able to try. While not every person is equal in their capabilities, each person is equal in the respect that they have the right to try.

2 comments:

  1. "When is comes to basic personality traits, there is no wrong or right."

    Yes, there is. The personality trait of being vain is wrong. However, like with all personality traits, a balance is required. I am confident, but not vain. I spend maybe 30 minutes a week in front of the mirror, 25 of which are spent shaving.

    Good read, but be careful of the difference between balanced and neutral (http://youtu.be/ussCHoQttyQ).

    ReplyDelete
  2. hard to tell if that comment was serious or not, but if it was...

    "Yes, there is. The personality trait of being vain is wrong."

    Right and wrong are both judgements. Judgements are, by nature, subjective. To propose that a judgement, which is just a fancy word for opinion, could be either right OR wrong is terribly --wait for it-- vain. To believe one's opinion is somehow more important, more correct or of some sort of absolute value or truth is nearing the definition of narcissism.

    @maromi: well written/worded. needs moar posts.

    ReplyDelete